🔗 Share this article

American government attorneys have asserted that a Libyan man willingly confessed to taking part in operations targeting US citizens, comprising the 1988's Lockerbie incident and an unsuccessful conspiracy to assassinate a US politician using a rigged coat.

Confession Information

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is said to have confessed his involvement in the killing of 270 individuals when Flight 103 was destroyed over the Scotland's community of the region, during interviewing in a Libyan detention facility in 2012.

Referred to as the defendant, the senior individual has asserted that three hooded persons forced him to make the statement after threatening him and his family.

His legal representatives are trying to block it from being used as proof in his court case in DC in 2025.

Courtroom Battle

In answer, legal counsel from the American justice department have said they can demonstrate in the courtroom that the confession was "voluntary, trustworthy and correct."

The presence of the defendant's purported confession was originally made public in the year 2020, when the US declared it was accusing him with constructing and preparing the explosive device employed on Flight 103.

Defendant's Allegations

The family man is accused of being a previous official in Libya's secret service and has been in US detention since recent years.

He has entered innocent to the charges and is scheduled to face trial at the federal court for the Washington DC in April.

The defendant's attorneys are trying to block the trial from hearing about the admission and have submitted a motion asking for it to be withheld.

They assert it was acquired under duress following the revolution which toppled Colonel Gaddafi in 2011.

Purported Coercion

They say former members of the leader's government were being targeted with wrongful murders, seizures and torture when Mas'ud was seized from his home by armed men the subsequent period.

He was transported to an unofficial holding location where additional inmates were allegedly abused and mistreated and was by himself in a cramped room when several disguised persons handed him a solitary sheet of paper.

His lawyers stated its manually written contents started with an order that he was to acknowledge to the Pan Am Flight 103 incident and another violent act.

Major Terror Events

The defendant asserts he was instructed to remember what it stated about the incidents and repeat it when he was interrogated by another person the following day.

Being concerned for his well-being and that of his offspring, he said he felt he had no choice but to acquiesce.

In their answer to the defense's request, lawyers from the US Department of Justice have stated the court was being petitioned to withhold "highly significant proof" of the defendant's guilt in "several major extremist events targeting American people."

Prosecution Responses

They assert the defendant's story of occurrences is unconvincing and inaccurate, and assert that the contents of the confession can be supported by credible external testimony gathered over numerous decades.

The prosecutors claim the defendant and fellow previous members of the former leader's secret service were held in a covert prison managed by a armed group when they were interrogated by an seasoned Libya's law enforcement official.

They contend that in the turmoil of the post-uprising period, the location was "the most secure place" for the defendant and the additional operatives, considering the violence and resistance attitude dominant at the period.

Investigation Particulars

According to the law enforcement official who interrogated the suspect, the center was "efficiently operated", the prisoners were not restrained and there were no indications of torture or intimidation.

The officer has said that over 48 hours, a confident and fit suspect explained his involvement in the bombings of the aircraft.

The FBI has also claimed he had admitted building a device which detonated in a West Berlin club in 1986, killing multiple individuals, including two US military personnel, and wounding dozens others.

Further Allegations

He is also alleged to have described his role in an attempt on the safety of an anonymous American Secretary of State at a official ceremony in the Asian country.

The suspect is reported to have explained that someone travelling the American official was carrying a explosive-laden garment.

It was the defendant's task to activate the bomb but he opted not to do so after learning that the person bearing the coat did not realize he was on a suicide mission.

He decided "not to trigger the trigger" although his superior in the agency being alongside at the time and asking what was {going on|happening|occurring